Reflections of Student Engagement Acts at the making process of a Course Evaluation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17267/2594-7907ijeh.2022.e3936

Keywords:

Institutional evaluation, Student engagement, Academic excellence, Medical education

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Institutional evaluation can diagnose tendencies e misalignment from its goals, knowing and recognizing its strengths and weaknesses. Thus, it’s related with the improvement of graduation quality and, therefore, of graduated professionals. The student participation at the development of this process is indispensable for the evaluation to consolidate itself as democratic and representative. OBJECTIVE: To present the experience of the Course Evaluation Day, an evaluation developed by students of a public medical school. EXPERIENCE REPORT: The evaluation’s design was proposed by medical undergraduates, based on evaluations such as SAEME and the SPICES method, aiming to discuss and evaluate the pillars: teacher-student relationship, infrastructure and educational planning. The event occurred in two periods, counting with the participation of undergraduate students from first to sixth classes. By the morning, there was a qualification step regarding the curricular guidelines, teaching methodologies, evaluations and students’ mental health, followed by the individual quiz filling. In the afternoon, there were the collective discussion spaces, followed by a plenary for sharing the main conclusions from each group and forwarding its claims. DISCUSSION: Student engagement was observed in policy and decision-making activities at the school, in the provision and evaluation of the school’s education program and when its feedback is considered in curriculum development and revision. CONCLUSION: This initiative enabled theoretical acknowledgement about health education, acquisition of organizing, responsibility and ethics skills, enrichment of the local medical education and potentialization of students' critical thinking.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Guilherme da Silva Machado, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (São Paulo). São Paulo, Brasil.

    Graduando em Medicina

  • Giovanni Pedroni, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (São Paulo). São Paulo, Brasil.

    Graduando em Medicina

  • Ana Helena Alves Reis Silva, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Campinas). São Paulo, Brasil.

    Graduanda em Medicina

References

Libâneo JC, Oliveira JF, Toschi MS. Educação escolar: políticas, estruturas e organização. 10a. ed. São Paulo: Cortez; 2011.

Freitas LC, Sordi MRL, Malavasi MMS, Freitas HCL. Avaliação educacional: caminhando pela contramão. Petrópolis: Vozes; 2009.

Arreola RA. Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system: a guide to designing, building, and operating large-scale faculty evaluation systems. EUA: Anker; 1995.

Pró-Reitoria de Graduação - Prograd. Avaliação de disciplinas [Internet]; 2020. Disponível em: https://www2.unesp.br/portal#!/prograd/avaliacao-de-disc/apresentacao22716/

Mika NM. A Avaliação Institucional como instrumento de melhoria do processo ensino-aprendizagem: do discurso para uma prática efetiva [Trabalho Final] [Internet]. Ponta Grossa: Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa; 2008. Disponível em: http://www.diaadiaeducacao.pr.gov.br/portals/pde/arquivos/35-4.pdf

Santomé JT. A reforma educativa e a psicologização dos problemas sociais. Educação e Realidade [Internet]. 1996;21(1):23-45. Disponível em: https://seer.ufrgs.br/educacaoerealidade/article/view/71639

Sistema de Acreditação de Escolas Médicas (SAEME). Instrumento de Avaliação [Internet]. Disponível em: http://saeme.org.br/portugues/instrumento-de-avaliacao

Harden RM, Sowden S, Dunn WR. Educational strategies in curriculum development: the SPICES model. Med Educ. 1984;18(4):284-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1984.tb01024.x

Ministério da Educação (Brasil). Resolução CNE/CES nº 3, de 20 de junho de 2014. Institui Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais do Curso de Graduação em Medicina e dá outras providências [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Educação; 2014. Disponível em: http://portal.mec.gov.br/index.php?option=com_docman&view=download&alias=15874-rces003-14&category_slug=junho-2014-pdf&Itemid=3019

Santos VH, Ferreira JH, Alves GCA, Naves NM, Oliveira SL, Raimondi GA, et al. Currículo oculto, educação médica e profissionalismo: uma revisão integrativa. Interf (Bot). 2020;24:e190572. https://doi.org/10.1590/Interface.190572

Patricio M. The ASPIRE initiative: excellence in student engagement in the school. Educ Méd. 2016;17(3):109-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2016.07.003

Dezan EB, Borges VTM, Nakashima AHR, Torres AS, Vanessa S, Padovani FH, et al. O processo de avaliação contínua do curso de graduação da faculdade de medicina de botucatu fmb/unesp: avaliação como instrumento de mudança [Internet]. Congresso Estadual Paulista sobre Formação de Educadores;2011. Águas de Lindóia, SP. Disponível em: https://repositorio.unesp.br/handle/11449/139699

Pinto HA. O Movimento Estudantil de Medicina e a transformação da Escola Médica. Interf (Bot). 2000;4(7):159-60. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-32832000000200023

NCIM do HC/FMB. FMB é premiada em Congresso Brasileiro de Educação Médica [Internet]; 2019. Disponível em: https://www.fmb.unesp.br/#!/noticia/2523/fmb-e-premiada-em-congresso-brasileiro-de-educacao-medica

Published

07/25/2022

Issue

Section

Experience Reports

How to Cite

1.
Machado G da S, Takagi FK, Pedroni G, Silva AHAR, Romanholi RMZ, Caramori J da CT. Reflections of Student Engagement Acts at the making process of a Course Evaluation. Intern J Educ H [Internet]. 2022 Jul. 25 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];6:e3936. Available from: https://journals.bahiana.edu.br/index.php/educacao/article/view/3936

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11