Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for Achilles’ tendon pain modulation: a case report of an elite soccer player
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17267/2965-3738bis.2026.e6696Keywords:
Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation, Tendinopathy, Achilles Tendon, Team Sports, Magnetic Resonance ImagingAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Managing partial Achilles’ tendon tears in elite soccer players during a competitive season requires a balance between structural healing and performance maintenance. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a potential neuromodulatory adjunct to manage pain and optimize motor efficiency through top-down regulation. OBJECTIVES: This case report evaluates the effects of a 17-session dual-site tDCS protocol on pain modulation, competitive performance, and structural tendon repair in a professional top-level soccer player. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The intervention consisted of 17 tDCS sessions (2mA) using a dual-target montage: anodal stimulation over the left primary motor cortex (M1) and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), with cathodal electrodes over the supraorbital and contralateral frontal midline areas. Assessments included the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and the Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) for recovery training and competitive matches. Structural evolution was monitored via serial ultrasonography (US) and confirmed by multi-sequence magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: The athlete exhibited a positive pain-exertion dissociation: a consistent progressive reduction in VAS pain scores occurred simultaneously with an increasing trend in match-play RPE, indicating a higher capacity for physical exertion despite the injury. Training RPE remained stable and low (1–3), reflecting controlled recovery workloads. Serial axial US initially identified a partial tear in the lateral and deep fibers with laminar fluid. A 30-day follow-up US and MRI (T1, T2-weighted with fat saturation) confirmed successful tissue repair, with intermediate-signal intensity tissue filling the defect, indicating organized scar formation without transfixing lesions. Serial axial ultrasonography initially identified a partial tear within the lateral and deep fibers of the tendon midbody, accompanied by localized laminar fluid. A 30-day follow-up, utilizing US and multi-sequence MRI (T1; T2-weighted with fat saturation), confirmed structural restoration. The previous defect was replaced by tissue of intermediate-signal intensity, consistent with organized fibroblastic repair and scar formation, in the absence of residual transfixing lesions. CONCLUSION: The dual-site tDCS intervention was associated with significant pain modulation and improved motor efficiency, allowing the athlete to increase competitive output during the structural healing phase. The correlation between reduced pain (VAS), increased match effort (RPE), and confirmed biological repair suggests that tDCS facilitated an optimal environment for recovery. This suggests that tDCS is a promising adjunct for maintaining elite performance during injury rehabilitation, though further controlled research is needed to elucidate the specific mechanisms of tDCS-mediated tissue repair.
Downloads
References
1. Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008;1(3):206-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004
2. Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000;527(Pt 3):633-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x
3. Naegel S, Biermann J, Theysohn N, Kleinschnitz C, Diener HC, Katsarava Z, et al. Polarity-specific modulation of pain processing by transcranial direct current stimulation – a blinded longitudinal fMRI study. J Headache Pain. 2018;19(1):99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0924-5
4. Lang N, Siebner HR, Ward NS, Lee L, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, et al. How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain? Eur J Neurosci. 2005;22(2):495-504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04233.x
5. Bahr-Hosseini M, Bikson M. Neurovascular-modulation: a review of primary vascular responses to transcranial electrical stimulation as a mechanism of action. Brain Stimul. 2021;14(4):837-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2021.04.015
6. Gellner AK, Frase S, Reis J, Fritsch B. Direct current stimulation increases blood flow and permeability of cortical microvasculature in vivo. Eur J Neurol. 2023;30(2):362-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.15616
7. Souza L, Moscaleski LA, Fonseca A, Fernandes VG, Nery GM, Morya E, et al. The competition between brain and body: does performing simultaneous cognitive and physical tasks alter the cortical activity of athletes compared to performing these tasks in isolation? Physiol Behav. 2025;297:114936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2025.114936
8. Fernandes VG, Moscaleski LA, Fonseca A, Morya E, Okano AH, Arruda AFS, et al. The dynamics of brain frequency bands and response to neuromodulation during cognitive testing in rugby sevens athletes throughout a sports season. Curr Psychol. 2024;43(39):30629-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06682-2
9. Gonçalves DS, Moscaleski LA, Silva GM, Morgans R, Okano AH, Moreira A. The effect of combined transcranial direct current stimulation and pneumatic compression as part of a comprehensive recovery strategy in professional male top-level soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2024;38(9):1658-66. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004844
10. Mehrsafar AH, Rosa MAS, Zadeh AM, Gazerani P. A feasibility study of application and potential effects of a single session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on competitive anxiety, mood state, salivary levels of cortisol and alpha amylase in elite athletes under a real-world competition. Physiol Behav. 2020;227:113173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113173
11. Moreira A, Machado DGS, Moscaleski L, Bikson M, Unal G, Bradley PS, et al. Effect of tDCS on well-being and autonomic function in professional male players after official soccer matches. Physiol Behav. 2021;233:113351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113351
12. Moreira A, Machado DGS, Bikson M, Unal G, Bradley PS, Moscaleski L, et al. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on professional female soccer players' recovery following official matches. Percept Mot Skills. 2021;128(4):1504-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125211021239
13. Moreira A, Machado DGS, Moscaleski LA, Baptista AF, Li LM, Morya E, et al. tDCS in exercise, sport performance, and recovery process. In: Brunoni AR, Nitsche MA, Loo CK. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neuropsychiatric Disorders. 2nd ed. Switzerland: Springer; 2021. p. 413-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76136-3_18
14. Moreira A, Moscaleski L, Machado DGS, ikson M, Unal G, Bradley PS, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation during a prolonged cognitive task: the effect on cognitive and shooting performances in professional female basketball players. Ergonomics. 2023;66(4):492-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2022.2096262
15. Moscaleski LA, Fonseca A, Brito R, Morya E, Morgans R, Moreira A, et al. Does high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation change brain electrical activity in professional female basketball players during free-throw shooting? Front Neuroergon. 2022;3:932542. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2022.932542
16. Okano AH, Fontes EB, Montenegro RA, Farinatti PTV, Cyrino ES, Li LM, et al. Brain stimulation modulates the autonomic nervous system, rating of perceived exertion and performance during maximal exercise. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(18):1213-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2012-091658
17. Valenzuela PL, Amo C, Sánchez-Martínez G, Torrontegi E, Vázquez-Carrión J, Montalvo Z, et al. Enhancement of mood but not performance in elite athletes with transcranial direct-current stimulation. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019;14(3):310-6. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2018-0473
18. Flood A, Waddington G, Cathcart S. High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation enhances conditioned pain modulation in healthy volunteers: a randomized trial. J Pain. 2016;17(5):600-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2016.01.472
19. Boggio PS, Zaghi S, Lopes M, Fregni F. Modulatory effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on perception and pain thresholds in healthy volunteers. Eur J Neurol. 2008;15(10):1124-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02270.x
20. Flood A, Waddington G, Keegan RJ, Thompson KG, Cathcart S. The effects of elevated pain inhibition on endurance exercise performance. PeerJ. 2017;5:e3028. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3028
21. Rêgo GG, Lapenta OM, Marques LM, Costa TL, Leite J, Carvalho S, et al. Hemispheric dorsolateral prefrontal cortex lateralization in the regulation of empathy for pain. Neurosci Lett. 2015;594:12-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2015.03.042
22. Mariano TY, Wout MV, Garnaat SL, Rasmussen SA, Greenberg BD. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates task-induced acute pain in healthy volunteers. Pain Med. 2016;17(4):737-45. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnv042
23. Vaseghi B, Zoghi M, Jaberzadeh S. The effects of anodal-tDCS on corticospinal excitability enhancement and its after-effects: conventional vs. unihemispheric concurrent dual-site stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9:533. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00533
24. Ong WY, Stohler CS, Herr DR. Role of the prefrontal cortex in pain processing. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56(2):1137-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-018-1130-9
25. Sankarasubramanian V, Cunningham DA, Potter-Baker KA, Beall EB, Roelle SM, Varnerin NM, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation targeting primary motor versus dorsolateral prefrontal cortices: proof-of-concept study investigating functional connectivity of thalamocortical networks specific to sensory-affective information processing. Brain Connect. 2017;7(3):182-96. https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2016.0440
26. McKinney J, Velghe J, Fee J, Isserow S, Drezner JA. Defining athletes and exercisers. Am J Cardiol. 2019;123(3):532-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.11.001
27. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63(suppl 11):S240-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20543
28. Foster C, Florhaug JA, Franklin J, Gottschall L, Hrovatin LA, Parker S, et al. A new approach to monitoring exercise training. J Strength Cond Res. 2001;15(1):109-15. Cited: PMID: 11708692
29. Korats G, Le Cam S, Ranta R, Hamid M. Applying ICA in EEG: choice of the window length and of the decorrelation method. In: Gabriel J, Schier J, Huffel S, Conchon E, Correia C, Fred A, et al. Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies. Vol 357. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 269-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38256-7_18
30. Seibt O, Truong D, Khadka N, Huang Y, Bikson M. Computational finite element method (FEM) forward modeling workflow for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) current flow on MRI-derived head: Simpleware and COMSOL Multiphysics tutorial [preprint]. bioRxiv. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1101/704940
31. Rainville P. Brain mechanisms of pain affect and pain modulation. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002;12(2):195-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(02)00313-6
32. Bornhövd K, Quante M, Glauche V, Bromm B, Weiller C, Büchel C. Painful stimuli evoke different stimulus-response functions in the amygdala, prefrontal, insula and somatosensory cortex: a single-trial fMRI study. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 6):1326-36. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf137
33. Nascimento RM, Cavalcanti RL, Souza CG, Chaves G, Macedo LB. Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with peripheral stimulation in chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2023;20(2):121–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2022.2039623
34. Vitor-Costa M, Okuno NM, Bortolotti H, Bertollo M, Boggio PS, Fregni F, et al. Improving Cycling Performance: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Increases Time to Exhaustion in Cycling. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144916. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144916
35. Laurent B, Peyron R, Larrea LG, Mauguière F. Positron emission tomography to study central pain integration. Rev Neurol [Internet]. 2000;156(4):341-51. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10795010/
36. Mouraux A, Diukova A, Lee MC, Wise RG, Iannetti GD. A multisensory investigation of the functional significance of the "pain matrix". Neuroimage. 2011;54(3):2237-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.084
37. Antal A, Terney D, Kühnl S, Paulus W. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex ameliorates chronic pain and reduces short intracortical inhibition. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;39(5):890-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.09.023
38. Antal A, Brepohl N, Poreisz C, Boros K, Csifcsak G, Paulus W. Transcranial direct current stimulation over somatosensory cortex decreases experimentally induced acute pain perception. Clin J Pain. 2008;24(1):56-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e318157233b
39. Grundmann L, Rolke R, Nitsche MA, Pavlakovic G, Happe S, Treede RD, et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary sensory cortex on somatosensory perception. Brain Stimul. 2011;4(4):253-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2010.12.002
40. Bingel U, Quante M, Knab R, Bromm B, Weiller C, Büchel C. Single trial fMRI reveals significant contralateral bias in responses to laser pain within thalamus and somatosensory cortices. Neuroimage. 2003;18(3):740-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(02)00033-2
41. Porro CA. Functional imaging and pain: behavior, perception, and modulation. Neuroscientist. 2003;9(5):354-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858403253660
42. Coghill RC, Sang CN, Maisog JM, Iadarola MJ. Pain intensity processing within the human brain: a bilateral, distributed mechanism. J Neurophysiol. 1999;82(4):1934-43. Cited: PMID: 10515983
43. Fomberstein K, Qadri S, Ramani R. Functional MRI and pain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013;26(5):588-93. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aco.0000433060.59939.fe
44. Apkarian AV, Bushnell MC, Treede RD, Zubieta JK. Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease. Eur J Pain. 2005;9(4):463-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.11.001
45. Baliki MN, Petre B, Torbey S, Herrmann KM, Huang L, Schnitzer TJ, et al. Corticostriatal functional connectivity predicts transition to chronic back pain. Nat Neurosci. 2012;15(8):1117-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3153
46. Sawamoto N, Honda M, Okada T, Hanakawa T, Kanda M, Fukuyama H, et al. Expectation of pain enhances responses to nonpainful somatosensory stimulation in the anterior cingulate cortex and parietal operculum/posterior insula: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci. 2000;20(19):7438-45. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-19-07438.2000
47. Ploghaus A, Tracey I, Gati JS, Clare S, Menon RS, Matthews PM, et al. Dissociating pain from its anticipation in the human brain. Science. 1999;284(5422):1979-81. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5422.1979
48. Bolognini N, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-8
49. Liebetanz D, Nitsche MA, Tergau F, Paulus W. Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 10):2238-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf238
50. Mauger AR, Jones AM, Williams CA. Influence of acetaminophen on performance during time trial cycling. J Appl Physiol. 2010;108(1):98-104. Cited: PMID: 19910336
51. Zancanaro M, Stein DJ, Lopes BC, Souza A, Toledo RS, Souza AH, et al. Preemptive transcranial direct current stimulation induces analgesia, prevents chronic inflammation and fibrosis, and promotes tissue repair in a rat model of postoperative pain. Neurosci Lett. 2023;813:137407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2023.137407
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Luciane Aparecida Moscaleski, Pedro Augusto Pontin, André Fukunishi Yamada, Gisele Maria da Silva, Daniel Soares Gonçalves, Lucas Filgueiras Freitas, Gilberto Amado Rodrigues da Cunha Filho, Victor Broglio Soraggi, Vinicius Felice Ponzio, Alexandre Moreira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
