The rhetoric of preprints
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17267/2675-021Xevidence.2021.e3732Keywords:
Preprints. Peer-review. Editorial process. Scientific freedom.Downloads
References
Horton R. The rhetoric of research. BMJ. 1995;310(6985):985-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6985.985
Yavchitz A, Ravaud P, Altman DG, Moher D, Hrobjartsson A, Lasserson T, et al. A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:56-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.020
McConnell J, Horton R. Having electronic preprints is logical. BMJ. 1998;316(7148):1907. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136%2Fbmj.316.7148.1907
Delamothe T. Electronic preprints: what should the BMJ do?. BMJ. 1998;316(7134):794-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136%2Fbmj.316.7134.794
Bloom T. Shepherding preprints through a pandemic. BMJ. 2020;371:m4703. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4703
Smyth AR, Rawlinson C, Jenkins G. Preprint servers: a 'rush to publish' or 'just in time delivery' for science?. Thorax. 2020;75(7):532-3. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-214937
van Schalkwyk MCI, Hird TR, Maani N, Petticrew M, Gilmore AB. The perils of preprints. BMJ. 2020;370:m3111. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3111
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Rafael Leite Pacheco, Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco, Rachel Riera
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain copyrights, transferring to the Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare only the right of first publication. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.