Desenvolvimento, validação e confiabilidade de questionário de dor lombar relacionada ao trabalho para profissionais de enfermagem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2025.e6110Palavras-chave:
Enfermeiro, Dor Lombar, Validade, Confiabilidade, QuestionárioResumo
INTRODUÇÃO: Vários fatores de risco induzem distúrbios musculoesqueléticos relacionados ao trabalho (DORTs), resultando em uma maior prevalência de dor lombar relacionada ao trabalho entre enfermeiros. Esta pesquisa teve como objetivo desenvolver e estabelecer a validade e confiabilidade de questionário de dor lombar relacionada ao trabalho (WRLBPQ) para profissionais de enfermagem. MÉTODOS: Este estudo empregou uma metodologia centrada no desenvolvimento, confiabilidade e validação de uma escala. Cinco especialistas com mestrado no assunto relevante e um mínimo de 10 anos de experiência acadêmica participaram da primeira discussão do grupo focal. Posteriormente, trinta e cinco especialistas se envolveram na avaliação da validade de conteúdo do questionário WRLBP. Para avaliar a confiabilidade, uma amostra de 200 enfermeiros empregados em hospitais foi escolhida para participar deste questionário. RESULTADOS: A ferramenta WRLBPQ recém-desenvolvida demonstra forte validade de conteúdo em nível de escala, alcançando uma pontuação superior a 0,78 para cada item. Os valores de kappa para cada item variaram de 0,97 para qualidade do item a 1 para conteúdo do item, indicando excelente concordância. A aceitação universal de cada item foi de 0,91 para qualidade e 1 para conteúdo. O coeficiente de correlação de Pearson foi empregado para determinar a confiabilidade teste-reteste, produzindo um resultado de rho = 1 para a sessão 1 e rho = 0,82 para a sessão 2. A confiabilidade interavaliador foi determinada usando o coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI), com valores de 0,76 para o avaliador A e 0,86 para o avaliador B, juntamente com um alfa de Cronbach de 0,98. CONCLUSÃO: O questionário WRLBP, a primeira ferramenta de medição entre profissionais de enfermagem, é uma ferramenta confiável e válida para avaliar WRLBP entre profissionais de enfermagem.
Downloads
Referências
1. Almaghrabi A, Alsharif F. Prevalence of low back pain and associated risk factors among nurses at king abdulaziz university hospital. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4):1567. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041567
2. Islam MJ, Ahmed S, Islam KMK, Al Mamun MA, Roy SK, Chakraborty SR. Characteristics of low back pain and its associated factors among healthcare providers at a tertiary hospital in Sylhet city: a cross-sectional study. Bull Fac Phys Ther. 2023;28(1):42. http://doi.org/10.1186/s43161-023-00152-9
3. Emmanuel NM, Ezhilarasu P, Bheemarao AB. Low Back Pain among Nurses in a Tertiary Hospital, South India. J Osteoporos Phys Act. 2015;3(4):1000161. http://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9509.1000161
4. Yokota J, Fukutani N, Nin K, Yamanaka H, Yasuda M, Tashiro Y, et al. Association of low back pain with presenteeism in hospital nursing staff. J Occup Health. 2019;61(3):219–26. http://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12030
5. Anap D, Iyer C, Rao K. Work related musculoskeletal disorders among hospital nurses in rural Maharashtra, India: a multi-centre survey. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;1(2):101. http://doi.org/10.5455/2320-6012.ijrms20130513
6. Yasobant S, Rajkumar P. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among health care professionals: A cross-sectional assessment of risk factors in a tertiary hospital, India. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2014;18(2):75–81. Cited: PMID: 25568602
7. Gaowgzeh RA, Chevidikunnan MF, Al Saif A, El-Gendy S, Karrouf G, Al Senany S. Prevalence of and risk factors for low back pain among dentists. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(9):2803-6. http://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.2803
8. Agrawal P, Maiya A, Kamath V, Kamath A. Work related musculoskeletal disorders among medical laboratory professionals: a narrative review. Int J Res Med Sci. 2014;2(4):1262-6. http://doi.org/10.5455/2320-6012.ijrms20141105
9. Kanakkarthodi R, Baby BE, Anapattath AN, Valappil JK, Afsar A, Jakribettu RP, et al. Low Back Pain Among Nurses in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital Malappuram Kerala. Cureus. 2022;14(11):e31622. http://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31622
10. Banga D, Samuel T, Yihune M, Bekele G, Molla E, Borie YA, et al. Prevalence of low back pain and associated factors among nurses working in public hospitals of Hawassa City, southern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Heliyon. 2024;10(9):e30300. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30300
11. Murray CJL, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, et al. Disability- adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2197–223. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4
12. Ijabadeniyi OA, Fasae JK. Prevalence of low back pain among nurses and the effects on job performance in tertiary health institutions in Ondo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences. 2023;18:100560. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2023.100560
13. Ahmed S, Numan SM, Rahman MH. Prevalence of work-related low back pain and associated risk factors among physiotherapists in Dhaka, Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2023;30(9):1–11. http://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2022.0064
14. Çinar-Medeni Ö, Elbasan B, Duzgun I. Low back pain prevalence in healthcare professionals and identification of factors affecting low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017;30(3):451–9. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-160571
15. Zaitoon RA, Said NB, Snober RH, Hussein RF, Abdoon AH, Shehadeh AMA, et al. Low back pain prevalence and associated factors among nurses: cross sectional study from Palestine. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):3076. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20481-1
16. Lloyd P. Back pain in nurses. Occupational Health: a Journal for Occupational Health Nurses [Internet]. 1987;39(4):109-10. Available from: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/2952914
17. Shieh SH, Sung FC, Su CH, Tsai Y, Hsieh VCR. Increased low back pain risk in nurses with high workload for patient care: A questionnaire survey. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;55(4):525-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2016.06.013
18. Nasa P, Jain R, Juneja D. Delphi methodology in healthcare research: how to decide its appropriateness. World j methodol. 2021;11(4):116-129. http://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116
19. Vogel C, Zwolinsky S, Griffiths C, Hobbs M, Henderson E, Wilkins E. A Delphi study to build consensus on the definition and use of big data in obesity research. Int J Obes. 2019;43(12):2573-86. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-018-0313-9
20. Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M, Sibony O, Alberti C. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PloS one. 2011;6(6):e20476. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020476
21. Adhikari S, Dhakal G. Prevalent causes of low back pain and its impact among nurses working in Sahid Gangalal National Heart Centre. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2014;12(28)167-71. Cited: PMID: 26032053
22. Lis AM, Black KM, Korn H, Nordin M. Association between sitting and occupational LBP. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(2):283-98. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0143-7
23. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
24. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in nursing & health. 2007;30(4):459-67. http://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
25. Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quiñonez HR, Young SL. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Frontiers in public health. 2018;6:149. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
26. Ibáñez SJ, Martinez-Fernández S, Gonzalez-Espinosa S, García-Rubio J, Feu S. Designing and Validating a Basketball Learning and Performance Assessment Instrument (BALPAI). Frontiers in psychology. 2019;10:1595. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01595
27. Malliaropoulos N, Korakakis V, Christodoulou D, Padhiar N, Pyne D, Giakas G, et al. Development and validation of a questionnaire (FASH—Functional Assessment Scale for Acute Hamstring Injuries): to measure the severity and impact of symptoms on function and sports ability in patients with acute hamstring injuries. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014;48(22):1607-12. http://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-094021
28. Chiwaridzo M, Chikasha TN, Naidoo N, Dambi JM, Tadyanemhandu C, Munambah N, et al. Content validity and test-retest reliability of a low back pain questionnaire in Zimbabwean adolescents. Arch Physiother. 2017;7:1-2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-017-0031-y
29. Björklund M, Hamberg J, Heiden M, Barnekow-Bergkvist M. The assessment of symptoms and functional limitations in low back pain patients: validity and reliability of a new questionnaire. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:1799-811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0405-z
30. Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Alavi-Majd H, Nikanfar AR. Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an Instrument for Measuring Patient-Centered Communication. J Caring Sci. 2015;4(2):165-178. http://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017
31. Cicchetti DV, Sparrow SA. Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am J Ment Defic. 1981;86(2):127-37. Cited: PMID: 7315877
32. Yudhistira TD. Content Validity of Agility Test in Karate Kumite Category. Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences. 2020;8(5):211-6. http://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2020.080508
33. Ayre C, Scally AJ. Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio: Revisiting the Original Methods of Calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 2013;47(1):79–86. http://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808
34. Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. 2016;15(2):155-63. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
35. Mishra A, Goyal M, Sharma S, Kumar P, Ahmed S. Establishing the inter-rater and test–retest reliability of the levator scapulae index in women with chronic mechanical neck pain: a reliability study. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation. 2022;29(10):1-8. http://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2022.0022
36. Garg A, Pathak H, Churyukanov MV, Uppin RB, Slobodin TM. Low back pain: critical assessment of various scales. Eur Spine J. 2020;29:503-18. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06279-5
37. Burbridge C, Randall JA, Abraham L, Bush EN. Measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the Roland Morris disability questionnaire. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020;4(70):1-15. http://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00234-5
38. Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Miyamoto M, et al. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2007;12(6):526–532. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-007-1168-4
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Pranshul Garlu, Arushi Mishra, Umang Singal, Deeksha Sharma, Mohammad Jahirul Islam, Saifur Rahman, Zamilur Rahman, Sohel Ahmed
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Esta obra está licenciada com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
