Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of Class IV Laser therapy and therapeutic ultrasound in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2024.e5538Keywords:
Laser Therapy, Neck Pain, Activities of Daily Living, Ultrasound TherapyAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Chronic neck pain (CNP) is a common musculoskeletal problem that affects a large proportion of the population and lasts longer than three months. It has a high cost in terms of life, disability, and healthcare. Several modalities have effectively provided immediate and long-term relief for CNP; however, the comparative clinical effectiveness of these modalities is limited. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to determine the clinical effectiveness of Class IV Laser therapy and Therapeutic Ultrasound (TUS) in patients with CNP. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-four patients with CNP of both genders were recruited from an age range of 20–45 years from the Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy of Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Physiotherapy, MM(DU), Ambala, India. They were divided into two groups at random: the LASER group A (n = 22) and the TUS group B (n = 22). The intervention duration was 2 weeks with 6 treatment sessions. Pre- and post-treatment outcome measures were assessed with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Algometer, Goniometer, and Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaires at baseline and after 2 weeks of intervention. The LASER group received a target dose of 10 joules per cm2 at a power of 10 watts, with a continuous dosage frequency. The TUS group underwent a continuous mode ultrasound (3 MHz, 1 W/cm2) for 6 minutes. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess the normality of the data. For parametric and non-parametric data analysis within the group, the paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank were used. The independent t-test and Mann-U Whitney test were used for the group comparison of parametric and non-parametric data, respectively. RESULTS: In both groups, there was a significant improvement in all the outcome measures (p<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between the two interventions in VAS, Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT), and NDI (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Class IV Laser therapy is clinically more effective than therapeutic ultrasound in treating patients with chronic neck pain.
Downloads
References
(1) Alayat MSM, Mohamed AA, Helal OF, Khaled OA. Efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy in the treatment of chronic neck pain: a randomized double-blind placebo-control trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;31(4):687-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-1910-2
(2) Dundar U, Turkmen U, Toktas H, Solak O, Ulasli AM. Effect of high-intensity laser therapy in the management of myofascial pain syndrome of the trapezius: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(1):325-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1671-8
(3) Buttagat V, Muenpan K, Wiriyasakunphan W, Pomsuwan S, Kluayhomthong S, Areeudomwong P. A comparative study of Thai massage and muscle energy technique for chronic neck pain: A single-blinded randomized clinical trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021;27:647-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.05.007
(4) Khare D, Pathak R. Effectiveness of elastic resistance band exercises versus conventional exercises on cases of trapezitis: A comparative study. Int J Orthop Sci. 2018;4(1):174-8. https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2018.v4.i1c.27
(5) Seo BK, Lee JH, Kim PK, Baek YH, Jo DJ, Lee S. Bee venom acupuncture, NSAIDs or combined treatment for chronic neck pain: study protocol for a randomized, assessor-blind trial. Trials. 2014;15:132. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-132
(6) Ortiz HAB, Cangas SA, Herrera AC, García FO, Velásquez SV. Efficacy of class IV LASER in the management of musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. Physiother Quart. 2021;29(2):1-11. https://doi.org/10.5114/pq.2021.105882
(7) Kheshie AR, Alayat MSM, Ali MME. High-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2014;29(4):1371-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1529-0
(8) Qing W, Shi X, Zhang Q, Peng L, He C, Wei Q. Effect of Therapeutic Ultrasound for Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(11):2219-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.02.009
(9) Kenareh R, Mirmohammadi SJ, Khatibi A, Shamsi F, Mehrparvar AH. The Comparison of The Efficacy of Photobiomodulation and Ultrasound in the Treatment of Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain: A Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial. J Lasers Med Sci. 2021;12:e20. https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2021.20
(10) Boonstra AM, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Reneman MF, Posthumus JB, Stewart RE. Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Int J Rehabil Res. 2008;31(2):165-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282fc0f93
(11) Young IA PT, Dunning J, Butts R, Mourad F, Cleland JA. Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with mechanical neck pain without upper extremity symptoms. Physiother Theory Pract. 2019;35(12):1328-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2018.1471763
(12) Oliveira AK, Dibai-Filho AV, Soleira G, Machado ACF, Guirro RRJ. Reliability of pressure pain threshold on myofascial trigger points in the trapezius muscle of women with chronic neck pain. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2021;67(5):708-12. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20201149
(13) Farooq MN, Mohseni Bandpei MA, Ali M, Khan GA. Reliability of the universal goniometer for assessing active cervical range of motion in asymptomatic healthy persons. Pak J Med Sci. 2016;32(2):457-61. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.322.8747
(14) Ilter L, Dilek B, Batmaz I, Ulu MA, Sariyildiz MA, Nas K, et al. Efficacy of Pulsed and Continuous Therapeutic Ultrasound in Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;94(7):547-54. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000210
(15) Serdar CC, Cihan M, Yücel D, Serdar MA. Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochem Med. 2021;31(1):010502. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2021.010502
(16) Ortiz HA, Liebano RE, Vera MAV, Cancino JO. Effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy added to a physical therapy program for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Rehab. 2022;36(3):35-48. https://doi.org/10.5114/areh.2022.119498
(17) Ezzati K, Laakso EL, Salari A, Hasannejad A, Fekrazad R, Aris A. The Beneficial Effects of High-Intensity Laser Therapy and Co-Interventions on Musculoskeletal Pain Management: A Systematic Review. J Lasers Med Sci. 2020;11(1):81-90. https://doi.org/10.15171/jlms.2020.14
(18) Best N, Loppar A, Derlien S, Ullrich S, Smolenski U. The effectiveness of ultrasound applications in comparison to high-intensity laser regarding to the outcome measure of pain intensity at patients with disorders of the lumbar spine or the shoulder. Phys Med Rehab Kuror. 2012;22(3):154-61. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1309024
(19) Fiore P, Panza F, Cassatella G, Russo A, Frisardi V, Solfrizzi V, et al. Short-term effects of high-intensity laser therapy versus ultrasound therapy in the treatment of low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011;47(3):367-73. Cited: PMID: 21654616.
(20) Kolu E, Buyukavci R, Akturk S, Eren F, Ersoy Y. Comparison of high-intensity laser therapy and combination of transcutaneous nerve stimulation and ultrasound treatment in patients with chronic lumbar radiculopathy: A randomized single-blind study. Pak J Med Sci. 2018;34(3):530-4. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.343.14345
(21) Mokmeli S, Vetrici M. Low level laser therapy as a modality to attenuate cytokine storm at multiple levels, enhance recovery, and reduce the use of ventilators in COVID-19. Can J Respir Ther. 2020;56:25-31. https://doi.org/10.29390/cjrt-2020-015
(22) Maeda T. Morphological demonstration of low reactive laser therapeutic pain attenuation effect of the gallium aluminium arsenide diode laser. Laser Ther. 1989;1(1):23-6. https://doi.org/10.5978/islsm.89-or-02
(23) King CE, Clelland JA, Knowles CJ, Jackson JR. Effect of helium-neon laser auriculotherapy on experimental pain threshold. Phys Ther. 1990;70(1):24-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/70.1.24
(24) Zati A, Valent A. Physical therapy: new technologies in rehabilitation medicine. Torino: Edizioni Minerva Medica; 2006.
(25) Chow R, Armati P, Laakso EL, Bjordal JM, Baxter GD. Inhibitory effects of laser irradiation on peripheral mammalian nerves and relevance to analgesic effects: a systematic review. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011;29(6):365-81. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2010.2928
(26) Hagiwara S, Iwasaka H, Hasegawa A, Noguchi T. Pre-Irradiation of blood by gallium aluminum arsenide (830 nm) low-level laser enhances peripheral endogenous opioid analgesia in rats. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(3):1058-63. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817ee43e
(27) Moriyama Y, Nguyen J, Akens M, Moriyama EH, Lilge L. In vivo effects of low level laser therapy on inducible nitric oxide synthase. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41(3):227-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20745
(28) Tam G. Low power laser therapy and analgesic action. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1999;17(1):29-33. https://doi.org/10.1089/clm.1999.17.29
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Diggaj Shrestha, Sunita Sharma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
