Is there a difference in the positioning of TENS electrodes in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea? Randomized study

Authors

  • Amanda da Rocha Rodrigues Centro Universitário de Barra Mansa/UBM
  • Fernanda de Oliveira Almeida Acadêmica do curso de Fisioterapia, Centro Universitário de Barra Mansa. Barra Mansa, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
  • Priscila de Oliveira Januário Docente, Centro Universitário de Barra Mansa. Barra Mansa, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
  • Ariela Torres Cruz Docente, Centro Universitário de Barra Mansa. Barra Mansa, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17267/2238-2704rpf.v11i1.3411

Keywords:

Dysmenorrhea. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation. Physical Therapy Specialty.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Dysmenorrhea is the most frequent painful condition in adolescents and young women causing absenteeism and presenteeism at work and at school. It is characterized by a mild, moderate or severe pain in the anterior pelvic region of the colic type, wich can happen before during or after menstrual flow. OBJECTIVE: To compare the influence of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in pelvic pain caused by primary dysmenorrhea with the electrodes applied in the anterior and posterior pelvic region. METHODS: 50 university students were randomly assigned to two groups of 25 volunteers: Anterior Pelvic Region Group (GA) and Posterior Pelvic Region Group (GP), who were submitted to TENS for 30 minutes and the intensity increased every 10 minutes and evaluated by the Visual Analog Pain Scale before, after and two hours after the end of treatment. GA participants had the electrodes applied in the anterior pelvic region and GB in the posterior pelvic region. RESULTS: There was a decrease in the pain in the moments before and after treatment (GA and GP p<0.0001) and before and two hours after treatment (GA and GP p <0.0001). In the moments after the treatment and two hours after its end it was possible to observe increase in the pain in GA (p=1.0000) and a decrease in the GP, however, the values were not statistically significant (p=0.8443). CONCLUSION: The use of TENS contributed to the reduction of pain in women in both groups, without statistical difference between them. Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials: RBR-67cjv5.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Amanda da Rocha Rodrigues, Centro Universitário de Barra Mansa/UBM

    Fisioterapia

    ORCID 0000-0002-0657-1731

  • Fernanda de Oliveira Almeida, Acadêmica do curso de Fisioterapia, Centro Universitário de Barra Mansa. Barra Mansa, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
    ORCID 0000-0003-1761-7237
  • Priscila de Oliveira Januário, Docente, Centro Universitário de Barra Mansa. Barra Mansa, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
    ORCID 0000-0002-9930-6805
  • Ariela Torres Cruz, Docente, Centro Universitário de Barra Mansa. Barra Mansa, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
    ORCID 0000-0002-0518-3964

Published

01/25/2021

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Rodrigues A da R, Almeida F de O, Januário P de O, Cruz AT. Is there a difference in the positioning of TENS electrodes in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea? Randomized study. Rev Pesq Fisio [Internet]. 2021 Jan. 25 [cited 2024 Nov. 23];11(1):163-72. Available from: https://journals.bahiana.edu.br/index.php/fisioterapia/article/view/3411

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 > >>